February 3, 2025
Plastic vs Metal — When Engineering Plastics Are the Better Choice
Many industrial components are traditionally made from metal. But modern engineering plastics can replace metal in numerous applications — delivering significant advantages in weight, cost, and performance.
Weight Savings
Engineering plastics typically have a density of 1.0–1.5 g/cm³, compared to aluminum at 2.7 g/cm³ and steel at 7.8 g/cm³. A PEEK component weighs approximately 80% less than its steel equivalent and about 50% less than aluminum.
Weight reduction directly impacts energy consumption in moving systems, shipping costs, and ergonomics. In aerospace and automotive, every gram saved matters.
Corrosion Resistance
This is one of the greatest advantages of engineering plastics. Plastics don’t rust, don’t oxidize, and don’t need surface treatments for corrosion protection. Metal parts require plating, anodizing, or painting — adding cost and maintenance. With plastic parts, these costs simply don’t exist.
This is especially decisive in chemical processing, food industry, and marine applications.
Self-Lubrication
Many engineering plastics (POM, PA, PEEK, PTFE) function in sliding applications without external lubrication. Metal bearings and sliding surfaces require regular lubrication, adding maintenance costs and contamination risk — particularly problematic in food processing and cleanroom environments.
Electrical Insulation
Engineering plastics are natural electrical insulators. Replacing a metal component with plastic eliminates electrical conductivity risks and simplifies assembly — no separate insulating sleeves or coatings needed.
Machining Costs
CNC machining of plastics is often faster than metals. Plastics cut more easily, place less stress on tooling, and rarely require post-processing such as deburring or surface treatment. This translates directly to lower per-part costs, especially in small to medium production runs.
When Metal Is Still Better
Extreme loads: For structural load-bearing parts under very high stress, metals remain superior.
Temperatures above 300 °C: While PEEK handles 250 °C, most metals operate at much higher temperatures.
Thermal conductivity is critical: When a part must efficiently conduct heat (e.g., heat sinks), metals are unmatched.
Electrical conductivity needed: Obviously, electrically conductive applications cannot use plastic.
Comparison Table
| Property | Engineering Plastics | Metals |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | Very light (1–1.5 g/cm³) | Heavy (2.7–7.8 g/cm³) |
| Corrosion resistance | Excellent | Requires protection |
| Lubrication needs | Often none | Usually required |
| Electrical insulation | Yes | No (conductive) |
| Machining speed | Fast | Slower |
| Maximum strength | Limited | Very high |
| Maximum temperature | 250 °C (PEEK) | >1000 °C |
| Thermal conductivity | Poor | Excellent |
| Finished part cost | Often lower | Higher (finishing) |
Successful Metal-to-Plastic Conversions
Pump impellers: Stainless steel to PEEK — 75% lighter, no corrosion, longer service life in aggressive fluids.
Plain bearings: Bronze to POM — no lubrication needed, lower friction, extended maintenance intervals.
Seals and bushings: Metal to PTFE-based — better chemical resistance, lower friction, no galvanic corrosion.
Conclusion
Using engineering plastic instead of metal isn’t a compromise — it’s often the better engineering solution. The key is selecting the right material for the right application. When conditions allow plastic, the benefits in weight, corrosion resistance, self-lubrication, and cost are undeniable.
Considering replacing metal with plastic?
We can help evaluate whether an engineering plastic suits your component. Tell us about your application and we’ll recommend the right material.
Contact us or Browse materials